Badge statuses are not accessable for color blind #92

New Issue

Open

opened 2023-04-16 10:46:34 +00:00 by valberg · 3 comments

valberg commented

2023-04-16 10:46:34 +00:00

Owner

The way of distinguishing status of a service with color does not make sense for those of us who are color blind.

Could we maybe use some other designation like emojis:

👍 : Positive
👎 : Negative
❓ : Unknown
🤙 : Partly (I'm on the fence on this one)

The way of distinguishing status of a service with color does not make sense for those of us who are color blind. Could we maybe use some other designation like emojis: 👍 : Positive 👎 : Negative ❓ : Unknown 🤙 : Partly (I'm on the fence on this one)

👍 1

valberg changed title from ~~Badges are not accessable for color blind~~ to Badge statuses are not accessable for color blind

2023-04-16 10:46:55 +00:00

benjaoming commented

2023-04-16 14:52:07 +00:00

Owner

OOPS!! This was sloppy - I was trying to write as little CSS as possible and doing as little design as possible :)

I think maybe WRITING the status works great for accessibility in general. So not just relying on the code.

OOPS!! This was sloppy - I was trying to write as little CSS as possible and doing as little design as possible :) I think maybe WRITING the status works great for accessibility in general. So not just relying on the code.

benjaoming commented

2023-06-04 21:18:57 +00:00

Owner

@valberg

what do you think about these?

✅ positive
➖ negative
⏳ partial
❔ unknown

I'm thinking that the hands are a bit bombastic and visually not so pleasing. The individual services already contain labels:

@valberg what do you think about these? ✅ positive ➖ negative ⏳ partial ❔ unknown I'm thinking that the hands are a bit bombastic and visually not so pleasing. The individual services already contain labels: ![image](/attachments/3a6d5064-5383-4b66-811b-ce5428a3accb)

image.png

76 KiB

benjaoming commented

2023-12-16 21:50:07 +00:00

Owner

@valberg do you think that the above works and we can close this?