Fix mistake in Sorting Subsections
documentation
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa0cf05fe0
commit
4e8093c589
|
@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Sorting sections is a bit less flexible: sections are always sorted by `weight`,
|
||||||
and do not have any variables that point to the next heavier/lighter sections.
|
and do not have any variables that point to the next heavier/lighter sections.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Based on this, by default the lightest (lowest `weight`) subsections will be at
|
Based on this, by default the lightest (lowest `weight`) subsections will be at
|
||||||
the top of the list and the heaviest (highest `weight`) will be at the top;
|
the top of the list and the heaviest (highest `weight`) will be at the bottom;
|
||||||
the `reverse` filter reverses this order.
|
the `reverse` filter reverses this order.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Note**: Unlike pages, permalinks will **not** be used to break ties between
|
**Note**: Unlike pages, permalinks will **not** be used to break ties between
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue