list positive things about static routing
This commit is contained in:
parent
644cb0eb83
commit
9bdc174a26
|
@ -276,6 +276,13 @@ Downsides to using static routing is
|
|||
\item often (almost!) has the best (default!) administrative distance when configured on a router whereby the static route is chosen over routes recieved via an IGP.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
Positive things to using static routing \textit{can} be
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item can be used for fallback route(s) if dynamic routing fails for unknown reasons,
|
||||
\item makes sense in a network with a low amount of routes needed in the routing table,
|
||||
\item network administrator have full control over routing behaviour,
|
||||
\item if needing a catch-all default route out of a network (i.e. exit route to e.g. the internet).
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
|
||||
\section{BGP}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue