update argument with regard to the eprivacy derogation
This commit is contained in:
parent
07dbc2e8e2
commit
c4676d511e
|
@ -220,9 +220,20 @@ An approach that focusses on quality instead of quantity is needed.
|
|||
<h2 id="expired_law">Without the updated legislation it will become illegal again to scan user's data</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
The platforms will continue to have the option and duty to delete illegal content that they are aware of even without chatcontrol.
|
||||
This is true for both, the old chatcontrol regulation and the new chatcontrol proposal.
|
||||
Platform providers are and will still be able to use their own terms and conditions to allow them to scan data on their platform as they see fit.
|
||||
Correct. This is because of the
|
||||
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPrivacy_Regulation">ePrivacy Regulation</a>,
|
||||
which protects digital communications in the EU</a>.
|
||||
This protection is meaningful and valuable.
|
||||
Chatcontrol violates the ePrivacy Regulation and that is why the EU commission has issued a
|
||||
<a href="https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662598/EPRS_STU(2021)662598_EN.pdf">temporary derogation</a>
|
||||
to legalize Chatcontrol version 1 (i.e. it makes voluntary scanning for CSAM legal in the EU).
|
||||
Chatcontrol version 2 wants to make this temporary derogation permanent and it wants to make the scanning mandatory.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Our private communication deserves protection
|
||||
and it should be respected as an actual private matter that the government may not spy on.
|
||||
The expiry of the derogation will be a good and reasonable thing,
|
||||
because our private communication is only the buisiness of the intended recipients.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="absolutely_necessary">Scanning will only happen when absolutely necessary</h2>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue