diff --git a/en/bigbrother.html b/en/bigbrother.html
index 0a11c6f..97ca4f7 100644
--- a/en/bigbrother.html
+++ b/en/bigbrother.html
@@ -220,9 +220,20 @@ An approach that focusses on quality instead of quantity is needed.
 <h2 id="expired_law">Without the updated legislation it will become illegal again to scan user's data</h2>
 
 <p>
-The platforms will continue to have the option and duty to delete illegal content that they are aware of even without chatcontrol.
-This is true for both, the old chatcontrol regulation and the new chatcontrol proposal.
-Platform providers are and will still be able to use their own terms and conditions to allow them to scan data on their platform as they see fit.
+Correct. This is because of the
+<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPrivacy_Regulation">ePrivacy Regulation</a>,
+which protects digital communications in the EU</a>.
+This protection is meaningful and valuable.
+Chatcontrol violates the ePrivacy Regulation and that is why the EU commission has issued a
+<a href="https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662598/EPRS_STU(2021)662598_EN.pdf">temporary derogation</a>
+to legalize Chatcontrol version 1 (i.e. it makes voluntary scanning for CSAM legal in the EU).
+Chatcontrol version 2 wants to make this temporary derogation permanent and it wants to make the scanning mandatory.</p>
+
+<p>
+Our private communication deserves protection
+and it should be respected as an actual private matter that the government may not spy on.
+The expiry of the derogation will be a good and reasonable thing,
+because our private communication is only the buisiness of the intended recipients.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="absolutely_necessary">Scanning will only happen when absolutely necessary</h2>